Select Page

CCH Axcess

CLIENT
Wolters Kluwer

PROJECT
AI Builders Comparison

ROLE
Design Director

TEAM
Builder.io, Figma Make, Lovable, v0

YEAR
February 2026

About

CCH Axcess is the accounting profession’s first modular, cloud-based tax preparation and compliance and workflow management solution..

Goal

Positioning AI as my “junior designers,” the objective of this experiment was to evaluate the outcomes produced by applying the same prompt across multiple AI-assisted design tools. Using a screenshot from a CCH Axcess Platform demo video, I provided an identical prompt to Builder.io, Figma Make, Lovable, and v0 to recreate a tax agent dashboard, including the Home screen, the Workflow > My View page, and a chatbot similar to CCH AnswerConnect.

Original Screenshot

Home

“Build a tax agent dashboard similar to the screenshot with a sidebar navigation and a grid of feature cards.”

Workflow > My View

AI Chatbot

The original screenshot did not include an AI chatbot, but this capability would add significant value by enabling agents to quickly access AI-generated, expert-validated tax guidance. Beyond answering research questions, the chatbot could be context-aware, interacting with each dashboard section to provide insights, surface risks, and support automation or action requests.

How would I improve the Design?

Taking the exercise one step further, I explored adding several KPIs designed to better support the agent’s workflow. While I operated under the assumption that these core sections are necessary, the greater opportunity is not simply adding more data, but improving how information is structured, prioritized, and contextualized on the Home screen to support faster understanding and decision-making. The goal would be to transform the dashboard into a decision-support system that reduces friction, highlights risk, and enables agents to act immediately.

Initially, I prompted each AI tool to:
“Update this tax agent dashboard to surface more high-value metrics and KPIs directly on the Home screen so agents can quickly assess status without navigating into individual sections.”

However, improving the design would require moving beyond volume of data and focusing on:
• Prioritization logic — Which KPIs are truly decision-driving versus informational?
• Progressive disclosure — What should be visible at a glance vs. expandable?
• Risk surfacing — Highlighting overdue, blocked, or high-impact items using clear visual hierarchy.
• Personalization — Tailoring metrics based on role, workload, or deadlines.
• Cognitive load management — Avoiding dashboard clutter while increasing insight density.
• Actionability — Pairing metrics with direct actions (e.g., “Review 5 at-risk returns”).

In a full-cycle project, I would validate these improvements through:
• Task analysis and workflow mapping per agent persona
• KPI prioritization workshops with stakeholders
• Usability testing focused on scan time and decision speed
• A/B testing layout density and information hierarchy

Conclusion

This exercise demonstrates how you can leverage AI as a rapid ideation partner within the Design Thinking process. In a full product lifecycle, this activity would sit within the Ideate phase. By treating AI tools as junior designers, I was able to quickly generate multiple approaches, uncover alternative interaction patterns, surface potential edge cases, and explore content and layout variations in a fraction of the time required for traditional concept generation.

For the purpose of this exercise, the source screenshot was treated as a proxy for validated user needs and prior research. In a real-world scenario, these concepts would be grounded in user insights, evaluated against business and technical constraints, and refined through usability testing and stakeholder collaboration.

Let's talk about goals and strategy for your product!

Email dhazell@gmail.com

© 2026 Hazell, LLC. All Rights Reserved.